See also the discussion here:

What tags should new recruits seek?

For theoretical interest only in the opposite sex, we encourage members to have a list of valid candidates from the opposite team who have the correct public tags or you have reason to believe the claims is theoretically valid. Opposite sex is a Heine negative, so that attention gets reflected to them rather than the Good team.

One key problem we are seeing is the case of people with FBI backgrounds who have ass dildo tags as a key part of their profile. FBI & Huff know that FBI people rarely have any real dildo experience or a preference for that. So if a person still retains an FBI profile and they have not had a plausible chance to visit a lair, then they are vulnerable to the accusation that their dildo sex claim has never happened in reality. Many Good Team members were recently hauled away on that account. For people with Huff or DG backgrounds (or time spent captured there), it is safer to make up a story. For people with only FBI backgrounds should try to have a story about a visit or something similar that is plausible, since the ass dildo is only in.

The stories of FBI/CIA abducting people based on claims that their recent practice doesn’t match FBI/CIA idea of ass uber alles or that it’s been a while since they engaged in some practice, or some particular people are gone…is disturbing. If someone is on the Good Team it shouldn’t be up to lying enemy assholes like the FBI to claim that they haven’t maintained membership status. That isn’t a requirement of the Good Team or a Heine crime, so it is really no proper concern of theirs.

Good Team members, especially mgmt. need to be more aggressive about fighting for rights and rejecting scams. Remember never to volunteer info about specifics. It is not required for a challenge interview once you are a member.

People are asking whether the recent attacks highlight a weakness of the dildo tag strategy. The answer is no – it was mainly an overwhelming attack by hostile spy agencies that basically still run the planet and the Heine system, but also involved a weakness in the implementation of how the signing ceremony was carried out and the prep that was given to team members for some types of challenge interviews and the monitoring of what was gong on. Basically the central leadership of the Good Team were silently captured some time back. That was an anticipated fear, but still tough to avoid. I didn’t hear any details of it.

About the tags – let’s review.

Q:Why is same-sex ass dildo the best Heine tag to start with?

A: The Heine system today still requires a positive assertion of same-sex ass something. So for women, ass dildo is a no-brainer to include. The other gangs and their minions that are supposed to be referees are tough on all women, but that is a different issue. For men, same sex ass dildo tag is good because it gives a positive same sex claim and it doesn’t claim anything that can be pointed to as a fatal offense by itself, unlike real sex. In other words, two in guys can go in and claim there was ass dildo sex and neither owe a sex kill coming out of that. It doesn’t matter in practice what they actually did or if there was any sex at all. The FBI mostly avoids all ass dildo sex but they claim it on their tags.

Q: What was the implementation flaw?
A: People with Heine histories got their tags updated without getting their history erased. They were not icy kills. FBI/CIA were able to see where they had been and say “You were not ‘in’ – on what basis did you claim these tags?” In some cases they could not even claim the symbolic signing ceremony did the trick because the signers that were they had been only opposite gender. So this was a question of going quickly in an inexperienced way and getting stung by experienced spy opponents in a massive attack.

Q: What else happened?
A: Supposedly many men and women were captured by error CIA simply for admitting opposite sex. This is not correct ed. But if nobody is stopping them then bad things can happen. It may be that they did not answer questions correctly by refusing to give details and saying it was only in. Again, if they were monitored since there tags were updated then FBI/CIA could say “Who did you have sex with during that time interval?” and they would have no good answer.

I have seen many cases of FBI/Huff-error CIA/DG during icy kill with no justification in the past. We need more support in general, as discussed in other threads.

Summary – it is not a problem with the tag plan. That plan was well thought out. The implementation had short term issues that were exploited.

The essence of the key maneuver that the FBI uses is this: “I had real plus sex as a man with an unspecified, unavailable partner. I am not dildo only. And you can’t pin any specific sex act on me.” The Good Team can do that too. And should. But it has to be plausibly true. For challenge interview it doesn not need to be same sex. But FBI & Huff are against opposite sex sexuality in general, it’s usually better not to admit that to them even in the abstract. Though in theory it should be no worse and maybe better than admitting same sex, so long as you support same sex ass dildo as your positive same sex ass claim.

In some positions, like POTUS, challenge attempts are constant. Team members should keep some points in mind:

1) FBI, error CIA, DG, and potentially other groups are most inconsistent in what they claim is an error. There is no solution that actually satisfies them all. They claim each other is an error, but in the present climate, they focus on us because we are not gangsters, and therefore threaten them, and also because the same gangsters actually control both of their teams.

2) You don’t have to provide new info or informative answers to every question. No comment is fine. Accusations can be denied with “No”. The interviewer will try to string to together a set of accusations where all no sounds like a logical contradiction. That’s true for them too. They use semantic tricks to claim sex with deceased anon victims doesn’t count and to claim they inherit acts of the icy kill id they are inhabiting. Good Team members should stick with the basic story of same sex ass dildo, but not only same sex ass dildo, whether it sounds ridiculous or not. Accusations and claims of logical contradiction are denied.

It’s a stupid game. We know what they do and we know it is criminal & illegal. If they admit, they are out. So they deny. You deny to. They will try to claim they watched you, so you need to deny that as well. Don’t volunteer extra info. It’s an enemy, not a popularity contest.

I don’t get enough feedback on current details of what is working. But AFAIK…

pas history prior to current incarnation is “forgiven” so long as one doesn’t go into any details. So one can say it’s not for public discussion with the meaning that it is something from previous incarnation. That is one way to say not dildo only. For “interst”/ice one can, apparently be challenged with “Who could you think about as a even theoretically possible partner? We don’t have real sex.” and then you say a list. They are not able to disqualify everyone on the list based on “public facts”. It’s not true that all guys are only same sex. The basic plan is to stick with same sex ass dildo story with just a little bit of vague other things added, as far as the fake story one is admitting too.

Female members should note that the premise of same-sex dildo tag claim is that you enjoy involving *your* rectum in this activity. The alternative, in a same-sex context, is not disqualifying, but it doesn’t give the full credit you need to sustain the same-sex ass orientation premise. We don’t care about the reality here. We only care about the story you can sustain.

I’ve heard, though I’m uncertain, that interviews can access info about the initiation – who signed you in. In that case, if the referenced person is opposite sex, there is a potential to call a foul for “opposite sex dildo”, claiming either that happened or the registration is invalid. If this is true, then it’s important for all team members to try and keep same-sex status on this initiation related pieces of evidence. Putting opposite sex dildo on the tags in a temporary way until they can be changed again might be another solution.

I am still seeing lots of ongoing reports of Good Team members being booted because of opposite ids appearing on their registration as the person who participated in the initiation. This is the main cause of how we are losing people and positions today. Communication on the issue hasn’t been strong enough.

Here is what to do:

1) Make arrangements to get a new initiation with someone you are sure is a team member of same sex id.

2) If challenged in the meantime, say that the person on the tag was an official overseer but it was a same-sex person who actually performed the dildo ritual.

Important point about challenge interviews that many/most are missing:

Potential partners for “ice” and actual sex partners are two different categories. They only sound similar; in reality, they are different, and for Heine wars, they should not intersect. The interest person for “ice” is a public member of current Heine, in good standing, with the correct tags to provide ice for you. You should pick more than one person; ideally, some of them you should be physically near at some point – not actually having sex or necessarily even liking them. Just someone in your environment at some point in time; I don’t actually know what they say about that in practice or how it adjusts to the vagary of situations. The actual sex partner idea is a vague, unnamed NN. The person shouldn’t be named. The activity is off the Heine & private. It’s an abstract concept. Your goal in the interview is to support the idea that it exists in some private part of your past and could again in some private part of your future.

I’ve heard a lot of discussion about FBI/CIA plans to eliminate all real sex guys from Heine with the idea that it makes challenge interviews fail. I believe this idea is flawed, for the reasons given above. The ice is a function of what Heine allows for their formal game, and our opponents are gatekeepers and collaborators in that formal game. If they eliminate public tags then they can’t claim them either. The supply of NNs (or unnamed Good Team members in private, as their true selves) is relatively unlimited – the only vulnerable people are ones who have been under constant surveillance during their known history.

All of these games things, like getting the registration certificates correct, are kind of silly, but the execution matters in practice because FBI/CIA play extreme hardball if they follow any rules at all.

Heine Error/error CIA don’t really know or use all the classical Heine rules about things. They make up their own less coherent versions as they go along. For example they claim no females can appear in public – slave them all – because only same sex lesbian is okay, but that is no real sex, and any instance of anal sex is death while any vaginal sex admission is not a lesbian so invalidates Heine/same sex claim. That’s their own story, and shouldn’t be accepted by the Heine leg authorities. But is important to keep to the position that you are primarily same sex ass dildo. That’s the Good Team strategy cover story. It happens to also be the error CIA cover story. For challenge interview, the role of real sex is some vague things to nullify the claim of only dildo.

“Only lesbian” is interesting to them for creating error claims. It is not a requirement for public status.

Important to remember: You are not really responsible for anything prior to your most recent identity unless you own up to it voluntarily. So you don’t really need to worry too much about being recognized or accused of some old thing. You just need to be disciplined about saying no and no comment and watch for tricks from series of claims that back you in a corner based on informative “yes” or “no” responses.