Q: Wouldn’t IC interfaces for aviators be another promising area of application?

A: Yes, absolutely. For GT strategy, Defense & Aerospace are still focused on violent Cold War against GT, but it would be straightforward to develop high quality prototypes with simulators of various sorts and then sell through 3rd parties.

This page about XUL frames could be stimulating for thought and prior work. Try to imagine generalizing these concepts to include no/brain image screen, multi-sensory display and input/output and hands-free/audio/gestrure applications.

Some applications may naturally want to map internal screens & touchpads to round or oval regions rather than rectangular ones – especially where space is naturally limited in resolution and shape. Planning for those cases might involve circular or oval clipping functions and a triangular grid that provides a better match to the rounded shapes inside. Probably makes sense to plan on adding that on top of the rectangular frame perspective used in WWW3.

The example of language/VR approach/devel tools/ and client-server multi-player model of the Unity Game/CAD platform is another worthy point of reference to consider. It is very popular and has produced high quality results in many different styles. Try to take the most relevant features from the different examples and expand the application space to multi-sensory and lower bandwidths. Using pre-defined input controls helps a lot for lower bandwidth (don’t repeat the mistake of X Windows, drawing all mouse movements and buttons on the remote end). Unity engine can support lower resolutions for visual scenes – events themselves could also be available in lower resolution versions to conserve bandwidth. The SMIL3 syntax is verbose, but the semantic concept is lower resolution description of presentation events. We can say that the markets usually want Unity quality visuals to be available where the bandwidth supports that.