As part of the heterogeneous, ad-hoc, “space” attack I experience, the “legacy” IoT/EMF can be directed to emit/give up their energy in a manner that allows other elements to harvest it. This allows ad-hoc networks with relays. A thin film layer that was able to call for energy & then dissipate it in a manner that didn’t allow unaffiliated harvesting would be the basis of 1 kind of cheap solution to treat legacy parts. Future networks might be designed with some sort of “security” about how they gather & focus power. But if they were truly heterogenous then they could easily cracked.

It turns out that the sabotaging of steel parts has been going on for a long time. Older examples of nails/pipes/conduits/zippers etc that can be harnessed as attack weapons may not be IoT or Nanotech in the technical modern sense, while still packing a punch. For some of these parts, we care what they look like & for many we don’t really care too much as long as they satisfy their design purpose & stop working as weapon/sensor purpose. For steel esp., it would be good to have 3 classes of invisible, polite/pretty, & “just really do it” solvents.

prior to 2015
https://www.linkedin.com/in/brent-taylor/