It’s interesting, in this context to consider the true reasons for why the FM gang embrace the motif of being “Democrats” & opposing the “Republicans”. One reason is anti-p, and calling their sex rape acts ‘d’. But ‘Republicans’ can also be parsed as no-p, u butt icy anus & that is the reality there too. So why the preference in the 1 party mafia state? The history of FM more linked to Lincoln’s Republican norm than Jefferson Davis’ Democratic South – again, why the switch? The psychological answer is that 19thC FM started in Europe with a age of revolutions motif of the underdog overthrowing the p overlord elites & that motif remains very popular today, even as FM is a military mafia running the planet & mashing the poor & helpless into fertilizer with glee. They enjoy the false narrative psychology of “Our gang took revenge on snotty p bullies & elites & females who wanted p & were not excited about rectum plunging, & any would be dates who value good simpatico or aesthetic qualities of partners. We showed them with our nasty rectum death as the last thing they ever see.” This is based on childhood programming of underdog revenge, systematically run by the world’s military schemers. Unprogramming is a massive undertaking.

The men at the highest apex pinnacles of Deep State mafia power embrace & draw energy from desires for power, control, sadism, secrecy, dominance, violence, debasement of alternatives, historic innovation, and their own personal safety. They don’t profile as defectors or bargainers. Who do they surround themselves with? They are not about cultivating rivals or heirs (who must kill them in the mafia way of things). They surround themselves with lieutenants who believe their niche is being that lieutenant & that they would be vulnerable & not thriving in alternative situations. In some fractions of the cases, their lust for sadism & dominance & destroying society may not be organically strong. They might be motivated to defect if they believed it would be a personal gain in forms of compensation that are not going to achieve in Deep State.

Tactically, I favor an open source intelligence plan here. GT can try to figure out true proposals, true future associates who would nurture them, and true ways to try & gain their defection & secrets without suffering double-crosses. Creating viable proposals to offer here is good strategy whether or not they are accepted. Offer again, offer again, offer again.