Common Redundancy For Robut Virtual DNS Hosting

[Josh SternModerator]

I’m saying: Prepare, well in advance, defenses against bogus DOJ/FCC arguments of “subverting protections of the ICANN system.”

Point 1- This isn’t designed to be a confusion look-alike
Point 2- Virtual DNS & P2P was reviewed in other legal contexts and not challenged per se. This is a way of doing that.
Point 3 – Robustly identifying sites with cryptographic principles is inherently stronger from a PKI POV, whether or not you believe the FBI and other groups are consistently hacking the std public PKI for corrupt reasons. Saving on those costs is also a benefit to end users and encourages more egalitarian participation.
Point 4 – The proposed system gives a way to create robust global multi-cloud availability & responsiveness of sites at a much lower cost because there is more choice available at each infrastructure layer – Domain Name registrar, partial cloud provider, etc. and various efficiencies accrue – more efficient PKI and multi-cloud integration.
Point 6 – Sysadmin/proprietorship via traveling laptop becomes easier.
Point 7 – Users/corporations may share streaming data sources from misc devices in ways that were not well supported by the std DNS system.
Point 8 – Better separation of communication protocol/msg format and domain name helps enable and speed up the development of new specialty protocols.

Point 9 – Top level domain authorities and cloud providers in this system enter into B2B and B2C relationships with their clients where both have a mutual interest in abiding by prevailing legal standards that prohibit various activities like trafficking of contraband of various sorts. Clients are advised to choose top level domains that offer explicit policies declaring an intent to abide by the legal standards and block/disallow known forms of criminalized networking.

[Author]

Posts