Communication, Open Education & Fighting

[josh]

There is a long tradition of Heine gang control of media – newspaperes, television stadions, radio…those facilities are owned and controlled, legally from a few positions & loyalists. In order to change them, one has to change the mindset of the owners/exec editors and then protect them from murder/replacement. Deep State also has a lot of control on the Internet. But it tries to serve ice. Go to to social media/bulletin boards, etc. and see if you can reach real people there or Deep State avatars talking in key. It may give some idea of where you are at. Police and similar groups can use the communications gear that they control and police against/prosecute interference with that. Get some lawyers to do pro bono work in courts to address things that are clearly crime.

[josh]

The most important kind of communication is to use prose/English and show it to outsiders. If you can’t do that in 1 step, then figure out how to do it in 20 steps. Women do not need to display open knowledge of high key. Then can read it only in if they already know low key, but it takes a while to learn the slang and conventions. Everyone can read English. Key reading is mostly valuable for listening to the editors in the back and for historical research. The people in the back can help communicate, but most have no physical safety there.

In other threads I talk about the idea of hiding English, using steganography or crypto, in situations where that counts as “only in” for communication. If you can’t teach, then hide the teaching and say they learned from me.

[josh]

People in the back emphasize that Deep State Heine gang claims heterosexuality preference is sufficient reason to abduct women. For this reason, women going around should state their preference as anonymous lesbian, for security. Which lesbian? None of your biz…It isn’t necessary or desirable to claim any sex with anon.

[josh]

In your “personal fort”, some things are only in, and some things are visible from the outside. Be clear about which in your design. If the set of people there are visible from the outside and the women can be inferred to be hetero, then they are at risk if they leave. If the woman can plausibly be lesbian and say that is a preference while any actual claim of sexuality is only in, then they are not vulnerable to official Deep State Heine abduction on grounds of sexuality. Simply saying lesbian preference while only being in with men might not be sufficient, although even that would slow them down, and that’s helpful too.

[josh]

Other things being equal, people have more protection if they are ‘in’ and a little bit of extra protection if they are connected to an ‘in’ without a sex violation. However, visiting a lair is asking for risk/trouble, so that should be avoided. Let’s say we have a woman who has had hair in lair dildo certification. She expresses a preference for lesbian. Can she help an indy woman if no dildo is introduced into that relationship? IMO, she still needs to not define the relationship to the indy as any kind of significant other or leak. That is up to Deep State to claim or prove. She gives less protection to the indy than a indy lesbian would, but lesbian association is helpful. She can also say that she sees/thinks about men that are not in her life. Is there a requirement for her to have 1 specific partner? No, why? Heine is against partnerships. She can help the indy with awareness and generic lesbian associations. The indy can help her with generic lesbian associations, provided no evidence of only in things are visible in the connection.

USA GOLD: Jessica Diggins and Kikkan Randall became the first Americans to win an Olympic gold medal in cross-country skiing Wednesday, shocking powerhouses Norway and Sweden in the women's team sprint at the Pyeongchang Games. https://t.co/jG9NdyRmvo pic.twitter.com/jNL8XK4wU5

— World News Tonight (@ABCWorldNews) February 21, 2018

[josh]

Different bins a women could be in:

1) In the back as a potential replacement candidate
2) In the back as a slave/editor
3) On the outside as a replacement
4) On the outside as an in A
5) On the outside as a non-affiliated A

Heterosexuality preference is only materially useful to women in category 1 who want to go out into a heterosexual slot. It is materially only harmful to 3), 4), and 5). For category 2) looking at me or someone else can help them avoid some types of abuse from asshole guards. Also, men on the outside might be friendlier to women advertising heterosexuality, but that is less relevant than survival. Spiritually, in pictures, in online conversation one can talk to whoever they want. For physical association, be careful to show it as non-sexual.

[josh]

There are in guys on the outside who are supposed to be or look like heterosexuals because of reversing preferences after substitutions. It is still deadly to have sex with them, but it would be okay to say you are waiting to meet them. “I am here patiently waiting for the magical in heterosexual who would sway me away from my lesbian life..” “No, you can’t meet him, that would be an error.” “Can I text message?” “In the meantime, I’ playing the field and keeping my options open. Not really in the mood for any ass dildoing today. Maybe some other time.”

[josh]

This tweet was composed by a ace guy in the back. A pro. He wanted to explain that Deep State is controlling the dispatch center at the Broward County Sheriff, including the woman in the picture. If one calls there – you are dealing with FBI/CIA.

Therapy dogs have been onsite at our Communications Center to help our dispatchers during this difficult time. pic.twitter.com/irZs37qs9G

— Broward Sheriff (@browardsheriff) February 19, 2018

[josh]

It’s in a kind of Georgian sounding male accent, in 4 keys A-D. I combined the most relevant info. The combination of the picture and the 4 keys indicates it was meant to be studied.

[josh]

Another general point about battling the FBI: they tend to have backdoors to most forms of electronic anything. That is not so much about super hacking as about actually having an in to all the companies that make things. If something has a programmable circuit board of any type, it is a good chance they can backdoor it pretty easily. If there is an option to eliminate programmable circuits from something you are relying on, it’s a little safer. That’s hard to do, but the principle is worth seeing and understanding and looking out for. On twitter, I’ve posted examples of hacking microcassee? How…did the cassette come with some remote access or did they sneak it one day and replace the original with a lookalike/workalike? Probably the 2nd in this case. But that would only be true if the original had no secret wireless component to begin with, despite being programmable (would only need a range of 10 ft. to be useful). So either is possible.

[josh]

Comment submitted: Reasoning by cases – e.g. a factual, precise proposition P, must be either true or false. It follow that if both P and not P imply a given conclusion, then the conclusion is true. In the case of Heine arguments, “dildo only” is often considered to be a tic, and “anal sex is often considered to be a tic”. So it follows that “only dildo sex or dildo sex + anal sex episodes” is also a tic. Only doing that is a no good in Heine theory and being vague about the frequency of each should not help. Perhaps some claim that combining them both in the same episode is some kind of different animal altogether. If so, other people can make parallel tricks. Goose, gander, sauce, whatever.

[Author]

Posts