Communications Investments

[josh]

No group today has any credible plan for cooperating with Deep State while not being a part of it. The reason for that is Deep State is opposed to such cooperation.. That could again change as a military tactice, but it would not be convincing in terms of sincerity & experience has shown that Deep State has no intention of keeping their word. I believe in the viability of cooperative groups that attempt to keep a lower profile in terms of Deep State targeting. They should be able to share hardware & comm resources.

[josh]

I was trying to confer – through this nonexistent interface – about comm issues at the end of 2019, early 2020. Topics covered included distributed multipath to prevent denial of service, & tricks to get encryption boostrapped from remote sites with Deep State trying to intercept in the middle. In other places we talked about the need for identity continuity. Ideally, there would be some comfortable, wearable tech that sampled biomarkers & kept information about continuity of that accessible (Deep State rugby’s are pretty extreme & common now). It’s also possible to pipe inet type steams to implant electronics using local adapters. I’m not sure what all of the issues are, but it’s disappointing to hear about claims of proprietary DOD carriers because it shouldn’t be necessary or desirable to use that, even if the claims are bogus.

[josh]

Smaller points:
Actually paying more for “Internet” isn’t a bad deal if the new product is making your life better in many ways.

If we focus on child use in econ calculations we should also focus on were the child consumer is actually receiving value that enriches & entertains them. There is no reason to assume that heterogeneous, low density of info, video fluff is what serves children well.

[Author]

Posts