FBI silliness & lies about "start of game"

Forums Personal Topics Unbidden Thoughts FBI silliness & lies about "start of game"

This topic contains 7 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  josh February 18, 2018 at 10:28 am.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #8557

    josh

    In spite of the above, the premise that July 24, 2013 should have been the start of something for the FBI other than simply a hot avenue to end my life is interesting. Why? What changed for the FBI on that date? So far as I know today, what changed i that I informed low level FBI people of some types of crime they were not supposed to know about from the POV of higher ups and that led to a lot more lies and killing. In spite of that, the number of people who know today is a lot greater than before. And that represents some partial success for my “game”, such as it was.

  • #8899

    josh

    Why, in 2017 and 2018, after years of murder and torture, would the FBI pretend play to accuse me of non-existent financial misdeeds? What would be the point? The FBI does a lot of things to waste my time, and that doesn’t waster any time. It can’t be a lead in reality because it isn’t based on anything. So what would be the goal?

    • #8900

      josh

      Someone say: “FBI wants to find a nice reason for why it disappeared all these people in Roseville, Shoreview, Arden Hills, Ramsey County…no discussion of doing that all over the country.

      I’m not seeing how some fictional financial issue with me would be the right kind of reason there. Can you help me out with that idea? I’m feeling very dumb for not spotting this clever plan.

      • #8902

        josh

        So you want to add something on the end of that like…”our operational genocide was well timed, allowing us to discover a bounced check by NN that was previouly unnoted in our files” Something like that ???

  • #8904

    josh

    Anna thinks that the FBI story about the Russian meddling is a pun on “Avon Calling” as “I van see all in g”

  • #9046

    josh

    More walking around in circles wood be good, I think.

  • #9049

    josh

    On twitter, Trump has remained a sex kill in all his recent incarnations. There is a systemic bias in that classification. To be a non-sex kill, there has to be no plausible sex kill claim.

    I’m not sure what the reason for the killing of the original A Donald Trump was. Looking at Wiki, the interpretation is get is that while at Wharton, he got stung by a kind of sleezy sex sting, set up as such – vaginal sex with a posed date who was an indy, not a replacement, and not an actual ass woman. His family was wealthy, so some bigger Heine deal looked into the ding and dinged the dingers. If that is correct, then B Donald Trump didn’t hang around for long.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.