This topic contains 10 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by 
Josh December 30, 2016 at 12:44 am.
-
Posts
-
JoshWhich is the key difference-making thing that u feel I can do quickly?
-
JoshOne key audience segmentation is about who Spook allows to actually read what I write. Does Spook hide it from all the packs of minions that Spook tells endless lies to, on the worry that some might think/act for themselves? If so, that helps me in some ways. If not, that helps me in some ways too. I don’t actually think Spook has a majority for endlessly destroying history and ripping off the public. Of course, it’s true that Spook has no interest in debating me. Spook’s position is that Spook isn’t even paying attention to me. I’m making the entire thing up. The torture, the burglaries, the blocked calls, the driving picks…all made up by a delusional malcontent who is beneath Spook’s radar. What about all the critical writing? It’s a split personality. One part writes and the other part is delusionally incoherent about everything happening to him every day. His daughter probably inherited the same traits…
And what about the press who has seen most of these kinds of claims before, except for the truly novel ones, which can’t be true, because they are too novel (because they were not written by the press). My intuition says I can reach novel and believable too, to some extent, but it takes a lot of focused work to get there.
-
JoshI hope we get to keep changing, composing the score. Not captured by life circumstances…maybe not captured by death either.
Ji Chang Wook lends his voice in an OST for web drama 'First Kiss for the Seventh Time'!https://t.co/rR0DGRFEVH pic.twitter.com/MMr3OryqUD
— allkpop (@allkpop) December 28, 2016
-
JoshThe number of actual female commentators and actors on Spook side has dwindled over time…
-
JoshPerfect moments for A! All year long. Bestt plan!
https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/814005523431428096https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/814005523431428096
-
JoshU want me to seriously review specific goals. Okay.
Non-concretely – I have been working pretty continuously to “achieve” the reality of being able to work effectively at a computer every day, preferably a desktop computer. This takes daily work to make progress and keep the progress I have made. Some days are much harder/worse/better than others. It depends on what the FBI is able to do. Changing my habits to minimize unattended departures from the house, in response to FBI installation of EMF guns within my home, is a big help. But they are responding by a quick installation of (I assume) battery operated (wirelessly rechargeable??) guns in the eaves of the house, which can be quickly placed during short trips away or over some combination of trips. These are very well positioned for shooting down on me in the basement, but not as high powered as larger guns with higher power sources. Still, the close proximity and variability of placement – eaves cover the entire front and back of the roof – make them annoying. My web project focus is documenting the reality that most people are badly informed and systematically misinformed about major current events where the US Security State plays a role. I aim to document that by considering a broad swath of historical and recent events. Why so broad?? Combination of reasons: a) recent feels more relevant but a lot more solid information is available about older events, so there is a tradeoff, b) if it was alleged that a big conspiracy had arisen during someone’s recent lifetime they would want to know how and when that happened – the reality that it happened before they were born and has been shaping the news for their entire life is both true and, in some ways, more plausible, c) all event descriptions are disputed by some – as with statistics and other methods of reasoning about uncertainty, larger collections instill more confidence in the conclusions, d) the roots of YOUR story started long, long ago; the particular form of your abuse seems to be largely a continuation of ancient criminal practices rather than a new thing; the corruption of the media began in the age when the media owners were not regarded as pure, enlightened truth-seekers; they were greedy, wheeling-dealing monopolists conspiring with others of their class – when they made pact with US military intelligence, that gave them a way to continue their criminal exploitation indefinitely. The Cold War, giving enormous boosts to the power and funding of Security State intelligence, helped that a lot. Media consolidation and the rise of the Internet were other big helpful steps. All of that aside, u remain the 8th, unseen, wonder of the World, that is difficult for me to objectively validate.
Focusing on the above set of goals, I know that I need to process a lot of written/evidential material and find an audience. Going through books available at the local public library was a kind of system that helped me to get started and low cost, so I have been pursuing that. I don’t spend a lot of time on any given book unless I feel it has a lot of material & the there is either no Kindle edition or the time savings of a Kindle edition for note taking is not huge – in a few cases where it is huge, I planned to buy the Kindle version. All that takes some time, but I wanting to be writing and finding some audience. My CIA blocked twitter was a dead end for that, so I am experimenting with some blogs, which do not have a big audience but do allow me to communicate to a few key people who have useful info they are happy to share.
At any given point in time, I can be inefficient in a couple of ways: 1) working on the wrong goals, 2) using weak methods to achieve a goal, or 3) goofing off. Goofing off is the easiest to assess. My percentage time goofing off has gone down a lot over the last few years. The other two categories are easier to judge in retrospect…one tries to learn from mistakes. I don’t feel that my post-2013 mistakes have been stupid. I’ve been pretty good at seeing the road blocked and the moving in new directions, with greater understanding.
When I come across interesting sources for a new/different topic in the course of researching something else, I try to save them for later reference, in a way that I can retrieve when needed. I don’t try to do more than that.
There is a criticism that the combination of being scattered by what is available in the public library, and by saving new references I miscellaneously encounter is widening the research true without a lot of world visible fruit. This is true, though I believe that every realistic attempt at widely visible fruit is going to be a long hard struggle, in part because that is the nature of the modern Internet community and in part because the FBI is fighting hard to prevent that, in all the ways they can think of.
I have recently started to think about writing some longer summaries of “CIA affecting the media” – I could put an article on the web, kind of by itself, and mentioned it in few places. Some people would read. Some might even link it within another piece. I also started to think about an article on the FBI targeting civilians – COINTELPRO updated, talking about Targed Individuals. That is going to be seen as more conspiracy oriented, with less “solid” evidence. The FBI is more secretive than the CIA and better able to crush leaks. Compare Tim Weiner’s book on the CIA with a long history and million solid sources vs. the book on the FBI, where sold references were a lot harder to come by, and that got more and more difficult as we got closer to the present…he eventually just seemed to end the book where the material who could establish as solid trailed off…or else he started to be warned/attacked…I’m not sure. In any case, it was an equally valid project that he was objectively a lot less successful with. The CIA released its documents, whereas Hoover made a point long ago of not keeping documents of his evil deeds and the FBI continued that. Weiner made that much clear in the book.
There are other topics I could blog about…and it becomes another blog, of only thematically connected topics. I’m trying to go for something different, but I do see the value in writing some longer articles.
-
JoshI’m making good use of Zotero as a specialized database which combines a lot of helpful features. The list of good features it includes is way longer than the list of useful features that are missing.
The ability to generate reference citations for various documents is one useful feature. Sometimes I use it like Delicious, but it is better for keeping notes and links attached, including links to my mime-encapsulated versions of the original.
I should do something to improve the workflow speed of doing that. MediaFire was a first stab at a solution, which works, but is a bit slow. Other alternatives have their drawbacks too.
-
JoshThe FBI is really good at making use of legal loopholes. One of those loopholes involves how little truth they need to neutralize someone as being in the category “probably mentally unbalanced and a potential threat to themselves or others”. They can & actively do create conditions for this perception while not exposing themselves much. The local police are conned, and when they make such a judgement there is no legal process and no appeal. FBI made it clear to me on several occasions that this was going to be one of their two main tactics – the EMF is the other, while the attempts at creating auto accidents are a persistent but distant third. How much do I have to say before they can get fake neighbor to tell the police they “are concerned” and saw such and such. Get 3 fake neighbors to do that and what defense do I really have?
-
JoshI say…it’s true. They swapped all my neighbors. They change roughly every 3 months. Different heights. Different numbers of children. Different habits. Sometimes wearing wigs. Sometimes showing dark stubble on heads that are supposed to be bald or blonde. Sometimes dressing men as women. All putting out their trash or recycling on the wrong day together. etc.
And they say “See, he’s delusional. Clear signs of perceptual delusions…obviously dangerous.”
Also the last of our year in review packages – on the man who dominated news like no one else in 2016. Can you guess who? @9NewsMelb pic.twitter.com/hSeXVkL2u9
— Brett Mcleod (@Brett_McLeod) December 30, 2016
-
JoshHow did they keep this a secret. I guess they just said it was important to the war. It was big and obvious, so folks were persuaded not to talk about it. Local undercover FBI operations are a lot less obvious, and people who know are told it’s important to some war on terror or counterintelligence. The FBI will ever scare the local schools with fake phone call threats to help convince local idiots that they are actually protecting something (besides their own slaves & secret same sex asshole brothels)
-
-
-
-
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.