Heine gangs have existed for centuries

[josh]

In key speech is set up to be a deniable expression of mostly criminal intent. Why would in key speech override the plain laws, as stated in prose? Some kind of criminal, “the law is not really serious” tradition? The precise things that prose expresses and the universality of agreeing on what it means is not matched in any way by in key speech. In key speech is not designed for that. It is designed to avoid that. If the public laws mean nothing today, what is the hope for suggesting some different practice by arch criminals, expressed within in key speech that is mostly comprehended by arch criminals, but misunderstood by most? An epiphany and change of heart? As a newcomer, the premises escape me. Perhaps the premise is that popular figures in public and politicians command armies of followers who meet their shadow opponents in the alleys. Today that is not true. It is spooks and special forces operating killing armies and replacing the public figures, mostly at will. In that reality, the premise is not only false – it’s dangerous, providing a cover illusion to hide the genocidal reality.

[Author]

Posts