This topic contains 2 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by 
Josh Stern December 31, 2022 at 3:50 pm.
-
Posts
-
Josh Stern
ModeratorBased on feedback, I want to emphasize a simpler description of how the concept above contrasts with the mafia chin relationships:
Point 1: We insist that both sides are free to end their relationships when it suits them. This should be normal – at least as ez as the public concept of moving to a new job. Easier because much work as a part time contractor flavor. We insist that nobody loses public legal rights in any sneaky way. They may agree to forgo some activities in explicit negotiations, bold print.
Point 2: The sponsors are LLC links rather than individual links, but the LLC links are characterized by their key human factors with permanent virtual netork ids.
Point 3: Individuals are free to work full time & get their communications & security & etc. from a single source. But that isn’t required. They are free to work in various partial arrangements & get their security, comms, etc. from the sources that best suit them, so long as compatibility is worked out.
-
Josh Stern
ModeratorExplicit in my description above was the idea that people can make informed choice among competing providers based on presentations of collected opinions. Implicit in that is the idea that prejudicial practices are open for review & criticism. If reviews said that a given provider heavily refers & defers to the prejudices of the military mafias that are trying to kill us, that would be issue flag for most of my friends. Try to avoid that association. But if the review process also believes they are peaceful then it might be a valued resource in a pinch – better than buying from enemy business, etc. People should know about these sorts of issues.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.