› Forums › Personal Topics › What I’m Up To › JFK Books and Videos
This topic contains 5 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by
Josh December 24, 2016 at 7:32 pm.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 24, 2016 at 4:16 am #615

JoshThe mortician story is important because there is a JE Hoover memo stating that they did not find any of Oswald’s prints on the rifle when it was in Dallas. The FBI took all the Dallas evidence to DC, played fast and loose with it for 3 days, and then checked what they liked in as evidence, discarding the rest and fabricating what they thought they needed. The mortician visit to get Oswald’s prints and somehow transfer them to the rifle or a lab test they could claim came from the rifle happened during that interval.
-
December 24, 2016 at 4:24 am #616

JoshThe video below by Robert Harris develops an interesting theory of the first gunman actually being in the Daltex building, trying to use a rifle silencer on his rifle which doesn’t work too well, missing the first shot or two with that, and then eventually hitting the shot that went through JFK’s back and then hit Connolly. It doesn’t have to be as magic if it doesn’t have to go up to hit JFK’s throat and it doesn’t have to emerge intact on some other person’s stretcher at Parkland. The angle works out pretty well, and there is other plausible evidence about who that shooter was – another mob guy, rounded up and released at the scene. In a big conspiracy, this a) the limo had to go pretty slow to take that sharp turn right in front of there, b) Daltex has a better angle than TBD, c) the signalling of the umbrella man probably meant that JFK wasn’t dead yet from shooter 1 so the other guys needed to open fire and finish the job.
-
December 24, 2016 at 4:31 am #617

JoshThat would explain some of why the conspiracy story was not smooth. The first guy was supposed to finish the job from the back, which would be blamed on Oswald. It was because he missed with the silencer at first that they decided to go with the backup. Then there were shots from two sides, and more audible shots then they wanted for the Oswald story. So they went with the backside, falsified the wound data, planted bullets (which was part of the original plan), and claimed that all the wounds came from the back and the grassy knoll was a mass crowd delusion.
-
-
December 24, 2016 at 5:41 am #619

JoshGarrison told people when he put CIA’s Clay Shaw on trial for conspiracy to assassinate that he wasn’t even expecting to live to see the trial. He had guards at his house all the time. The FBI sent numerous undercover people to sabotage the case, which they ended up “winning” with an acquittal, then they went after him some more. His lost his marriage/family, which must have been hard because his parents had divorced when he was 2. The movie makes it sound like the FBI never really left him alone until he appeared on the Tonight Show and got a lot of popularity for his position. Perhaps that wasn’t the exact causality. I feel it’s a shame that the movie doesn’t shed any light on what really motivates the big armies of black ops people who go undercover to participate in domestic crime. I’ll have to look for that in other kinds of sources.
-
December 24, 2016 at 7:32 pm #622

JoshSounds to me like Pt. Punarvasu has been watching a few of the interviews with our salt of the earth Texans. They is democratic.
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.