Proposal to serve US Deep State

Forums Positions Proposal to serve US Deep State

This topic contains 14 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  josh April 10, 2018 at 5:20 pm.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #10912

    josh

    The designator “US Deep State” may not be best, but I don’t know of a better term. When Xi talked of “Chin A”, Deep State emphasized there was no spokesperson for China…who speaks for you? Not Donald Trump. Not General X.

    Who is actually benefitting from your version of 1984? Don’t tell me “ass is winning”. Most of “ass” is dead. The 0.1% in your bunkers that are calling the shots? Is life more fun for them than it was 50 years ago because they get to count the lives they have ended on a colored board? How long is that game going to last? It is almost over. What’s left? You don’t have a coherent public to run the world. You’ve raised gangs of babbling dildo ass monkeys who are mainly good at hate and obedience. How is that helpful to the leaders fun? It’s boring.

  • #10913

    josh

    I haven’t intentionally said anything negative about homosexuality or homosexuals – and I don’t think negatively about homosexuality or homosexuals in my mind. I curse people who are actively attacking me with the words I think of. That difference is pretty clear to me.

  • #10915

    josh

    I don’t see any logical connection between having/valuing an all gay space and killing all non-gay indies. Claiming such a connection is clearly erroneous thinking. Why endorse it?

  • #10916

    josh

    You want me to explain to women how you would like them to act within your gay space? Okay, I can do that.

    • #10917

      josh

      All the things I have read/heard suggest there is wide variation among in men in how they would like to interact with women & wish for women to behave. You fight wars about that, at times. Updated guidance needs to be more specific.

      • #10918

        josh

        The Deep State foot soldiers of today are trained to dislike women and have no use for them. I’m following your lead here, but I don’t see where it is going. Again, I emphasize that a lack of basic prose is a big handicap, even for you.

        • #10919

          josh

          You say “You are a problem because being straight guy is a distraction to women. We don’t want that in our gay space. We don’t want you.” I say “Okay, I don’t need to be in your gay space.” You say “The distraction is a still a problem because we want women in our gay space.” I say “Okay, I will help you to explain how you want women to behave in your gay space.” You say “We don’t really need women. We are replacing them. Never mind.”

          So why bother about me? You just negated your own point.

          • #10920

            josh

            It’s a pattern you have repeated over and over with me. You make a point or claim…and it turns out to be phony. Repeat. It’s all phony. You attacked me before making any points and you are still attacking me, killing. In between there is only a sequence of phony claims. You say “Don’t question Ed. You have no Ed. True Ed is to not question Ed.”

            Well no, because you can’t compare a situation where you are continuously attacking someone before, during and after while showing them your Ed is all bullshit and then complaining that they see too well. That is idiotic, even for you.

          • #10921

            josh

            In history…Heine began with conquering nomadic warriors. When they conquered one place, they moved on to another. Today, conquering the world…there is no interesting place to go in space. So you need a need way of doing things. Saying “I’m an asshole, I go conquer” doesn’t work because there is nothing left to fight over.

          • #10925

            josh

            Another point is that the FBI is running the show here and they are extremely biased by their “cover my ass” agenda, always prioritizing that over everything else. I’ve done my best to pay them back, helping the world to see that their ass is putrid, nasty, all lies, and violently genocidal. But habits die hard, so they still pretend that covering their ass, & a fake discussion of past schemes that went awry, is somehow relevant here. This is because the low level people authorized to make noises are mainly worried about not being killed for mistakes. It’s a shitty way to run an organization.

  • #10922

    josh

    Q: How else can I be a helpful conversationalist if I am not a true ally?

    A: I can point out logical & practical contradictions and likely problems.

    Q: How can we trust what you say?

    A: You don’t have to trust it. You can think about it and check it for yourselves.

    Q: Why doesn’t your bias matter?

    A: The reason I just gave is one point. Another point is that sometimes our interests align. For example…above you started to talking about women problems. In point of fact, you did not raise adult women to be asses. If you want asses. You raised them to be pretty and to sting men. Now you decide you don’t need those functionalities any more so get rid of women. I say “Notice that is a huge, non icy jump you are making there that you haven’t thought through. How likely is it to actually turn out well rather than some sort of disgusting crisis of civilization? Not likely. So there you go…

  • #10923

    josh

    Murdering all men who have had real sex is also a very big leap.

  • #10927

    josh

    Is it that I should say the violently abducted man is accused of actually using his penis for sex, & Deep State probably has proof of the accusation?

  • #11062

    josh

    My proposal was, obviously rejected. So I speak for myself, being objective because I prefer that style.

    The FBI was placed in a tough position by Heine which wanted all of these things:

    1) Killing me
    2) None leaks about Heine reality
    3) Anna to keep working like she had been
    4) A kind of spectacle of abusing the outsider asshole.

    They decided to delay 1) while focusing on some compromise of the other 3). Did they do a good job? If you focus only on those set of objectives you might say that they did. However they proceeded to continue & accelerate genocide of outiders/independents/critics, heterosexuals, women, active homosexuals, peaceniks, sticklers for law, etc. So they are basically destroying the United States and Heine. This illustrates the perils of a focus that is too narrow and a complete lack of ethics and common sense.

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.