This topic contains 1 reply, has 1 voice, and was last updated by 
josh August 27, 2021 at 10:54 am.
-
Posts
-
joshIn situations with high risk/peril (like actual reality, for most all people in the world), many people will be happier & perform better with a more rosy, less threatening/perilous story about what is going on. The Heine mafia/Deep State crime has focused on enforcing false, rosy stories on all people in order to enable easy harvesting/ending of folks with low noise/noticing. The economic motivations for that ended, & it is now the preoccupation of sadists. Sadists as such, don’t continue to agree that hiding their assaults from notice is the highest priority so long as they socially engineer continuing ability to carry them out. That situation adds extra stress.
People should be able to pick their own path for how much of true negative explanation they want/need/demand while not being fed lies. Removing lies that they have already been fed involves some sort of remediation that may not have natural boundaries.
Ending govt. assaults/murders & attacks on your community is the highest priority. Within that imperative, everyone doesn’t need every story. But how much can you really do without while not increasing risks? Safety is more of a problematic issue than performance. Safe the luxury of ignorance for people & situations that can actually afford that. Save panic for rare needs to flee quickly. When people are used to a given set of cognitive threats, they don’t stay in an emotional state of panic. They are not as happy as being carefree. Creating more carefree reality should be a community goal.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.