Wireless Crypto Tunnels In Our WOW Reality

[Josh SternModerator]

Maybe something similar to ICA analysis could weigh in on optimal additional carrier styles for a given traffic region. But for mfg., it seems that one wants a language/vocab for allowing adaptive selection from a known family of choices. How to design that? It’s at the intersection of Information Coding Theory, Functional Analysis, Approximation Theory. Seemingly a new question.

[Josh SternModerator]

My expertise is low, but considering the framework of this link on wireless crosstalk I would think about adaptive protocols that try to might, say, divide the cycle of “you’re on now peaks (read at that timepoint to test for a 1 or a 0)” to 1024 shares, and then adaptively communicate to a synchronized client which subset of the 1024 are allocated to them at the present time. It seems like that could be made backwards compatible if necessary. The amount of crosstalk with neighboring channels would be partly a function of amplitude & transmission directionality – a monitor drone could give relevant readings.

[Josh SternModerator]

Q: GT focus is a lot about navigating past Deep State isolation BOD, while techs outside of GT are excited about speed. What is the big picture about bumping speed?

All of these things can bump speed:

a) faster avg. bandwidth per wireless link – both adaptive use of the radio space & increased directionality of signaling help. Drones can also be enablers of both of those features.

b) Multi-path allows links to be used in parallel. If the multi path is many instances of 1-hop to drone & then to “earth cable station” then it boosts speedwith the parallelism

c) Increased use of adaptive dictionaries for data compression between what & what? Crypto privacy interferes with data compression using dictionaries/caches. So where we insist on crypto (and yess this is true even for the https/ssl3 that Deep State is reading now) then we need to enable a design feature that a user pays for “speed dictionary cache” run on a secure server in fast net land. And probably a protocol that only uses the cache for less sensitive material, because it persists at the user end & the network site.

[Josh SternModerator]

We can think about a caching dictionary that only focuses on data strings longer than some fixed length (probably starting at over 1K bytes), only using full sequences & sets of those, focusing on the low security repeated end of the data world, possibly using prediction based on population usage patterns (updates from frequently requested sources…). The coding should be able to communicate “diff patches” to prior sets.

What is enough privacy crypto in that context??

[Josh SternModerator]

Focusing again here. In the wireless space we face a constant trade off of signal level vs. power consumption with possible cross talk & possible regulatory issues in some places. So generally, we like to use the lowest signal level that is reliable. Use of directional antennaes can help achieve reliability at a lower power level. Generally, we need to adaptively insure that if 1 is high signal & 0 is low signal level for a given channel we operate, it should still be the case that the 0 level is reliably above chance background noise/crosstalk.

Making that decision correctly & communicating it adaptively may be a real key to success & the defining criteria for attenae design & placement.

[Josh SternModerator]

Situations with complex crosstalk from “us” and from outside burst noise are not well modeled analytically. But it would be useful to couple simulations with Q-learning models and adaptive regimes that try to predict the probability of different decision region results (1,0, nothing, noise erasure) as signal parameters are dynamically adjusted. Can’t prove which method is best, but we can say which methods score the best & how well they perform in the simulations that are most similar to the real cases of interest.

[Josh SternModerator]

Perhaps there is also a point here about transmitters. The geometry of signal dispersion implies that transmitters with very tiny apertures have the best directionality. The surface area is not high, but they can work like guns (c.f. laser design). If the antennae available is very directionally selective, then it’s possible to engineer a process of finding & then locking on the direction for lower signal energy per km.

[Author]

Posts